休閑

【】

字号+作者:囫圇吞棗網来源:娛樂2025-01-18 18:54:47我要评论(0)

As the 2020 U.S. presidential election inches closer, much of the discourse around misinformation ha

As the 2020 U.S. presidential election inches closer, much of the discourse around misinformation has centered on Facebookand Twitter.

However, there’s one popular platform that’s been missing from the conversation: Wikipedia.

The popular online encyclopedia has become more trusted over the years, yet anyone can edit it. A platform like that should be ripe for misinformation. Yet, the site’s army of volunteer editors have kept the site mostly free from “fake news.” And Wikipedia has already taken some action to maintain the integrity of the site before the election.

Mashable Light SpeedWant more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories?Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter.By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.Thanks for signing up!

Last week, Wikipedia rolled out “extended confirmed protection” on its 2020 United States presidential electionpage, as first noticed by Wired. This classification blocks any users from making edits to this Wikipedia entry unless they have been a registered user for at least 30 days and have made a minimum of 500 edits on the site. The move should stop any newcomers joining the page just to cause havoc by publishing fake results.

Mashable Games

Wikipedia administrators will also maintain a “watchlist” of political pages about congressional races, the election pages for each state, and other election-related entries.

A longtime Wikipedia editor told Wiredthat additional protections are expected to roll out as well. For example, the final election results will likely only be sourced by one of the more reputable news outlets, such as the Associated Press. An experienced page administrator will likely be the one granted the power to enter the final results on the page.

A scenario where nefarious users attempt to edit Wikipedia pages with unofficial or even entirely fabricated election results seems entirely plausible, if not expected. Wikipedia is preparing itself for this. We’ll see if it's effective next week.

Related Video: How to recognize and avoid fake news

TopicsSocial MediaElections

1.本站遵循行业规范,任何转载的稿件都会明确标注作者和来源;2.本站的原创文章,请转载时务必注明文章作者和来源,不尊重原创的行为我们将追究责任;3.作者投稿可能会经我们编辑修改或补充。

相关文章
  • Nate Parker is finally thinking about the woman who accused him of rape

    Nate Parker is finally thinking about the woman who accused him of rape

    2025-01-18 18:39

  • 張琳芃重返訓練場與廣州隊合練 傷勢已基本康複

    張琳芃重返訓練場與廣州隊合練 傷勢已基本康複

    2025-01-18 16:50

  • 伊瓜因:梅西C羅都很喜歡我 因為覺得我值得信賴

    伊瓜因 :梅西C羅都很喜歡我 因為覺得我值得信賴

    2025-01-18 16:48

  • 曼城VS多特複盤
	:無鋒開場遭限製 丁丁偽9成勝負手

    曼城VS多特複盤  :無鋒開場遭限製 丁丁偽9成勝負手

    2025-01-18 16:23

网友点评