探索

【】as a source only in limited situations.

字号+作者:囫圇吞棗網来源:熱點2025-04-24 20:45:51我要评论(0)

Prepare yourself for less celebrity gossip on Wikipedia.。Editors for the site (who are all volunteer

Prepare yourself for less celebrity gossip on Wikipedia. 。

Editors for the site (who are all volunteers) voted Wednesday to almost entirely ban the British tabloid newspaper the 。Daily Mail。as a source, calling the publication "generally unreliable."。

SEE ALSO:Early newspaper editions could not keep up with that legendary Super Bowl ending 。

The。 Daily Mail 。's reliability has been a point of contention on the user-edited encyclopedia site since 2015 if not earlier. But discussion about its efficacy as a source was revived in early January when one user led the campaign against the 。 Daily Mail 。Daily Mail 。

. 。

Mashable Games

Editor Hillbillyholiday argued during a discussion that the outlet is untrustworthy for science-related stories, inappropriately posts photos of children and has limited credibility even with direct quotes and interviews.。 Those opposed could not support a blanket banning but agreed on a comprise: to use the  。Those opposed could not support a blanket banning but agreed on a comprise: to use the 。

Daily Mail。as a source only in limited situations.。Mashable Top StoriesStay connected with the hottest stories of the day and the latest entertainment news.Sign up for Mashable's Top Stories newsletter 。

By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. 。 By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.。Thanks for signing up! 。

Mashable ImageOne user commented with a "strong oppose" comment that "The。

Daily Mail 。

, as hated as it is, is a very mixed bag. It can contain wonderful information such as accurate and informative interviews with highly respected people."  。 The Daily Mail was dragged through the mud on a Wikipedia discussion about its reliability.Credit: Steve Meddle/REX/Shutterstock 。 Ultimately, though, the news outlet has been effectively banned as a source, due to its "reputation for poor fact checking, sensationalism, and flat-out fabrication."  。

The Wikimedia Foundation, who runs the main Wiki site, pointed out that the outlet isn't fully banned -- its use as a reference is just "generally prohibited, especially when other more reliable sources exist.” But the key takeaway is that the 。 Daily Mail 。Daily Mail 。

is no longer a go-to reliable source for citing something on a page.。 The ruling does not mean the。Mail。 can never be used as a source, but editors are being encouraged to change information that cites the publication to a different source.  。 The。 Mail 。joins the 。 National Enquirer。among the few outlets that Wikipedia has called out in particular.。

The Sun。


and the 。
Daily Mirror 。
are also seen as unreliable. Wikipedia also warns against using state-run media like China's Xinhua or Iran's Press TV as sources. 。Additional reporting by Jason Abbruzzese. 。Featured Video For You 。Even Fox News is defending CNN against Trump 。

1.本站遵循行业规范,任何转载的稿件都会明确标注作者和来源;2.本站的原创文章,请转载时务必注明文章作者和来源,不尊重原创的行为我们将追究责任;3.作者投稿可能会经我们编辑修改或补充。

相关文章
  • Tesla's rumored P100D could make Ludicrous mode even more Ludicrous

    Tesla's rumored P100D could make Ludicrous mode even more Ludicrous

    2025-04-24 20:22

  • Google is building a killswitch that will force the internet to play by its rules

    Google is building a killswitch that will force the internet to play by its rules

    2025-04-24 20:21

  • NASA isn't hiring someone to protect you from evil aliens

    NASA isn't hiring someone to protect you from evil aliens

    2025-04-24 19:46

  • Brilliant New York Post cover perfectly sums up Trump's White House

    Brilliant New York Post cover perfectly sums up Trump's White House

    2025-04-24 18:51

网友点评